Feb. 10th, 2005
Either I missed something somewhere, or this method for neural decoding produces results waaaaaaay better than the other methods, even though it's really simple.
Somehow I think I must have screwed something up, because otherwise everyone would already be doing this. I guess I'll find out at my meeting this afternoon.
Somehow I think I must have screwed something up, because otherwise everyone would already be doing this. I guess I'll find out at my meeting this afternoon.
(no subject)
Feb. 10th, 2005 04:35 pmYou Are A Romantic Realist |
You are more romantic than 40% of the population. ![]() You tend to be grounded when it comes to romance. Sure, you can fall hard... but only for someone you've gotten to know. And once you're in love, you can be a total romantic goofball... But you'd never admit it to your friends! |
(no subject)
Feb. 10th, 2005 04:36 pmFor those of you who were wondering about my earlier entry in which something was too good to be true, it was. (Too good to be true, that is.) As I expected, I did something wrong, producing amazingly excellent results. ;) Lucky for me I knew I must have done something wrong, so I was not disappointed to find out that my amazing results were not so amazing after all!